Jagbir And Others v. Haryana Staff Selection Commission
216 (3 cases)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:14.09.2022 1) CWP-28978-2017 (O&M) Jagir and others .....Petitioners
Versus
Haryana Staff Selection Commission and others ...Respondents 2) CWP-29183-2017 (O&M) Vikram Singh .....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
3) CWP-29581-2017 (O&M) Anil Kumar .....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present:
Mr. R.S. Dhull, Advocate for the petitioners (CWP-28978-2017).
Mr. Sunil Polist, Advocate for the petitioner (CWP-29183-2017).
Mr. Birender Singh Rana, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shubham Singh Gangola, Advocate for the petitioner (CWP-29581-2017) Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, D.A.G., Haryana.
Mr. D.S. Patwalia, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Kannan Malik, Advocate for respondents No.3 & 4 (CWP-28978-2017) ***** ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL) Petitions herein, inter alia, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus for directing the respondents to declare the petitioners qualified in the written examination for the purpose of calling them in interview.
ASHISH 2022.09.15 09:44
CWP-28978-2017 (O&M) & Connected Cases -22.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners states that claim of the petitoners has been accepted during pendency of the writ petition. Most of them have been offered appointment letters except petitioner No.4 - Harmeet Sandhu in CWP No.28978 of 2017, who could not appear for interview due to some medical problem, qua which he has submitted representation dated 18.10.2021 which is still pending and no decision has been taken on the same.
3.
Learned State counsel submits that a decision will be taken by the competent authority, either way, on the pending representation of the said petitioner by passing a speaking order as expeditiously as possible.
4.
In the premise, writ petition is disposed of with the expectation that the administrative decision will be taken on the pending representation of the said petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, and the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail remedy as per law, in case the administrative order is not favourable.
5.
Pending civil miscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of.
ASHISH 2022.09.15 09:44