Minakshi v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

CWP No.22595 of 2019 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.22595 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision.26.08.2019 Minakshi

...Petitioner

Vs State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

Present:

Mr. Suresh Kumar Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL -.- AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner, at this stage, would be satisfied if a direction is issued to 2nd respondentDirector, Higher Education, Shiksha Sadan, Sector 5, Panchkula to consider the representation dated 31.07.2019 (Annexure P-8) in terms of guidelines dated 13.02.2019 (Annexure P-7) within a stipulated period. Without going into the merits and demerits of the claim of the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to direct 2nd respondent-Director, Higher Education, Shiksha Sadan, Sector 5, Panchkula to consider the representation dated 31.07.2019 (Annexure P-8) in terms of guidelines dated 13.02.

2019 (Annexure P-7) within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and shall pass a speaking order thereon, failing which respondent No.2 shall be liable to pay costs of `25,000/- to the petitioner. This condition of imposing costs is only to prevent petitioner from running pillar to post and avail remedy of contempt in case of non-compliance of directions issued by this Court. PANKAJ KUMAR 2019.08.

CWP No.22595 of 2019 (O&M) -2The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE August 26, 2019 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PANKAJ KUMAR 2019.08.29 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document