Rahul v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M- 40356 of 2020 (O&M) Date of decision : 21.12.2020 ...

Rahul ................Petitioner vs.

State of Haryana .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan Present: Mr. G.S. Kaura, Advocate for the petitioner.

...

H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral) Case taken up through video conferencing.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that inadvertently it has been mentioned in the petition that it is first petition for regular bail, though this petition is second one, as such, he be permitted to withdraw the present petition and he may file fresh petition after carrying out the necessary correction.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

The petitioner may file a fresh petition in accordance with law, enclosing copy of order passed by this Court in the first petition. ( H.S. Madaan ) 21.12.2020 Judge chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No BANITA CHUGH 2020.12.21 15:48 I agree to specified portions of this document