High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/8051/2016disposed of

Subhash Chander v. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd & ORS

2023-01-12Mr. Justice Raj Mohan Singh2 pages

CWP No.8051 of 2016(O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.8051 of 2016(O&M) Date of Decision: 12.01.2023 Subhash Chander ......Petitioner Vs Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH Present:Mr. Shubham Kashyap, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Singal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Abhilaksh Grover, Advocate for the respondents.

**** RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) [1].

The petitioner has preferred this writ petition for the issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to count the work-charge service of the petitioner from 17.02.1970 to 05.02.1985 towards qualifying service for the purpose of pension and other retiral benefits and release the same along with interest.

[2].

Along with the replication filed by the petitioner, the petitioner has annexed the order dated 28.11.2016 and contends that vide the aforesaid order, it has been decided by the respondent-Nigam to count the period of service rendered by the petitioner in the work-charge capacity w.e.f. 14.11.1968 PRINCE SAINI 2023.01.13 12.30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CWP No.8051 of 2016(O&M) to 05.02.1985 except EOL 268 days, which has been tabulated in the earlier part of the order towards pensionary benefits subject to the condition to deposit EPF amount (employee/employer share) along with upto date interest. [3].

Even according to the learned counsel for the respondents, though the order was passed on 28.11.2016, but the petitioner has not complied with the same till date. [4].

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause being recurring in nature, the petitioner shall do the needful in the context of order dated 28.11.2016 within a period of one month.

[5].

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that on making the compliance of the order dated 28.11.2016 by the petitioner, needful in the context of counting the period of service in the work-charge capacity w.e.f. 14.11.968 to 05.02.1985 except EOL 268 days, shall be done by the competent authority within a further period of one month. [6].

In view of consensus arrived at between the parties, this writ petition is disposed of.

(RAJ MOHAN SINGH) 12.01.2023 JUDGE Prince Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PRINCE SAINI 2023.01.13 12.30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment