Om Parkash Garg And Others v. State Of Punjab And Another

2024:PHHC:024781








    
    

  ! "#$#%& '


 

 

  

  



   



 (&  )*(  +
(     

 

 
!

  "
#$ 
 
   
# 

% "
## "
 &&& AMAN CHAUDHARY. J. (Oral) 1.

The prayer in the present Civil Writ Petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is for quashing Punjab Government circular dated 02.08.2017 (Annexure P-10) as well as clarification dated 18.09.2017 (Annexure P-11).

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the present petition has been rendered infructuous on account of averments made in para No. 8 and 9 of the written statement dated 06.08.2019, which reads thus:- "8. That the contents of this para 8 have already been explained in forgoing paras of the preliminary submissions. It is further submitted that the instructions dated 13.06.2012 have been withdrawn vide instructions dated 27.06.2017 in compliance of orders dated 22.10.2013 in CWP No. 25733 of 2012. That in compliance to the above direction of this Hon'ble Court and in similarly situated matters, the department passed a speaking order dated 20.07.2017 issued by the office of Director of Public Instruction (Secondary Education) i.e. respondent no.2, in compliance with the orders passed in the cases of AP Sharma and Karanvir Singh and the Finance Department Gaurav Arora 2024.02.23 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document notification dated 27.06.2017. A copy of the speaking order dated 20.7.2017

2024:PHHC:024781




 is annexed as Annexure-R-14 whereby directions were issued to all District Education Officers (Secondary) Punjab and District Education Officers


            

    

 

     

 

  


 ! 

     "

   #$%&#%'$        () *   *+

,- #.$//  #%'#  ##'%#%'/

  0

  1 - -  , #'23&4#%'&
/

 #%%$#%'$
67  84'9  3.

Learned counsel would submit that the petitioner be granted permission to file a representation, in case any grievance still subsists, which may be decided in a time bound manner.

4.

Learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made.

5.

In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. However, in case the petitioner submits a representation, as stated above, within a period of one month, the respondents are directed to decide the same expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of its receipt. ,(  -   ''(

#  
+ 0 2 
) *+

+  

) *+ Gaurav Arora 2024.02.23 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document