Surinder Pal Singh v. Pswc And ANR.

CWP-29327-2017 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-29327-2017 Date of decision: - 30.01.2019 Surinder Pal Singh ....Petitioner

Versus

Punjab State Warehousing Corporation Chandigarh and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present:- Mr. J.P. Rana, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Kshitij Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1.

**** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) Counsel for respondent No.1 states that he has the instructions to state that the impugned order 'nil' (Annexure P-9) communicated vide letter dated 26.02.2015 passed by the appellate authority will be withdrawn and a fresh order will be passed by the appellate authority in accordance with law.

Keeping in view the said statement, counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press the present writ petition, at this stage and the same be disposed of as not pressed.

In view of the above, the present writ petition stands disposed of, as not pressed.

NARESH KUMAR 2019.02.06 15:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP-29327-2017 -2Let the appropriate orders in view of the statement for withdrawing the order 'nil' (Annexure P-9) communicated vide letter dated 26.02.2015 be passed and a fresh order by the appellate authority shall also be passed expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months, from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order in accordance with law.

( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) January 30, 2019 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking?

Yes Whether reportable?

No NARESH KUMAR 2019.02.06 15:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh