Ram Singh v. State Of Haryana & ORS

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-29481-2017 Date of Decision: December 21, 2017 Ram Singh .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL 1.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

Yes/No 2.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No.

3.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No .......

Present:

Mr.Johan Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.

........

SURYA KANT, J.

The petitioner has filed Election petition No.1, dated 20.01.2016 titled as 'Ram Singh vs Rajbir and others' under Section 176(4) of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994. The Election petition is now pending in the Court of Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Division)-cum-Election Tribunal at Hodal, District Palwal. The prayer in the instant writ petition is to direct the Election Tribunal to decide the above-stated Election petition at the earliest.

[2] Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, coupled with the fact that there is a fix tenure of the office of Sarpanch, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Election Tribunal to decide the abovementioned Election petition expeditiously and preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. ( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE December 21, 2017 ( SUDHIR MITTAL ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No Meenu 2017.12.22 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh