← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/9173/2015dismissed

Sushma Rani And ANR v. State Of Punjab And ANR

2016-07-26Mr. Justice S.P. Bangarh2 pages

CWP 9173/2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision:26/07/2016.

Smt.Sushma Rani and another ............Petitioners vs State of Punjab and another .............Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present:- Mr.Ashok Arora,Advocate for the petitioners.

Jaswant Singh,J(Oral) Two petitioners i.e. Smt.Sushma Rani and Smt.Anju Khera were appointed as Social Studies Mistresses on 2.9.2001 with the Department of Education(Schools)Punjab pursuant to their selections on 13.12.1996 as appointments of such teachers were delayed due to pending litigation.

Prayer now made is for fixation of their notional pay w.e.f. 1.1.1997 as has been fixed in the case of Mohinder Singh,Master and Smt.Nirdosh Kumari. The basis for seeking such relief is that they were selected in the same selection and thus entitled to same treatment. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners, no case for interference is made out.

It is apparent from the record that the pay of Smt.Nirdosh Kumari and Mohinder Singh were notionally fixed w.e.f. back dates on account of teachers juniors to them in merit having been appointed earlier. Rajinder Parshad Joshi 2016.07.28 12:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP 9173/2015 In the present case, it is a conceded position that both the petitioners have their joint seniority only with Smt.Nirdosh Kumari, who concededly is senior to both the petitioners. As regards, Mohinder Singh, his seniority is in male cadre and has no connection with the seniority of petitioners. Thus, no parallel and benefit can be drawn on the basis as canvassed. In view of the above, finding no merit in the present petition the same is dismissed with costs of Rs.5000/- each (Rupees five thousand each) to be deposited by the petitioners with District Legal Service Authority concerned within two months from the receipt of a copy of this order.

26.07.2016 (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge Whether speaking/ reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Rajinder Parshad Joshi 2016.07.28 12:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document