Farid And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others

106 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-10046 of 2020 Date of Decision: 07.12.2020 Farid and another

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL Present:- Mr. Ram Kamal Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Pratham Sethi, Advocate, for respondent No.4. DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (ORAL) Case taken up through Video Conferencing.

In view of the fact that the alleged detenue has appeared before this Court through video conferencing and stated that she would want to live with her parents, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the present petition.

Dismissed as not pressed.

(DEEPAK SIBAL) December 07, 2020 JUDGE R.S.

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2020.12.09 19:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document