Darshan Lal v. State Of Haryana & Others

CWP No. 29531 OF 2017 --1--

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 29531 OF 2017 DECIDED ON: DECEMBER 22, 2017 DARSHAN LAL .....PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH

Present:

Mr. Jagran Singh Cooner, Advocate, for the petitioner.

***** JASPAL SINGH, J (ORAL) By virtue of instant petition preferred under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has sought issuance of a writ in the nature mandamus, directing the respondents to count the daily wages service of the petitioner followed by the regular basis for the purpose of revised pensionary benefits with interest. And also to release the arrears of leave encashment as per 7th pay commission.

2.

At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits though legal notice dated 27.09.2017 (Annexure P-3) was duly served upon the respondents but till date no conscious decision has been taken by them. He further submits that petitioner feels satisfied in case direction is issued to respondent(s) to decide aforesaid legal notice, within a stipulated period. 3.

Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent(s) to consider the case of the petitioner unfolded in his legal notice Sonika 2017.12.22 16:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No. 29531 OF 2017 --2-- dated 27.09.2017 (Annexure P-3) and take a conscious decision, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4.

However, if the petitioner still feels aggrieved against any of the order(s) passed by the concerned authority, he shall be at liberty to approach this Court.

DECEMBER 22, 2017 (JASPAL SINGH) sonika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable Yes/No Sonika 2017.12.22 16:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh