Lakhwinder Pal And ORS v. State Of Punjab And ANR

CRM-M No. 41661-2022 --1--

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.41661-2022

Reserved on: 16.01.2023

Pronounced on: 06.02.2023 Lakhwinder Pal and others ......Petitioners Vs.

State of Punjab and another ......Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Krishan Kanha, Advocate for Mr. N.S. Lucky, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Harsimar Singh Sitta, DAG, Punjab.

None for respondent No. 2.

*** ANOOP CHITKARA J.

FIR No.

Dated Police Station Sections 27.05.2022 Kamboj, District Amritsar Rural 420 and 120-B IPC The petitioners, arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, have come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise with the aggrieved person. 2.

During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the aggrieved person have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition as Annexure P-2. 3.

After that, the petitioner came up before this Court to quash the FIR, and in the quashing petition, impleading the aggrieved person as respondent No. 2. 4.

On 15.10.2022, the aggrieved person-Paramjeet Kaur i.e. complainant/respondent No. 2 appeared before the JMIC, Amritsar and stated that there would be no objection if the court quashes this FIR and consequent proceedings. As per the concerned court's report dated 31.10.2022, the parties consented to the quashing of FIR and consequent proceedings without any threat.

JYOTI 2023.02.07 09:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

CRM-M No. 41661-2022 --2-- ANALYSIS & REASONING:

5.

However, the petitioners did not arraign Harpreet Singh i.e. husband of complainantParamjit Kaur as a respondent in this case. 6.

Since all the victims did not state about their no objection to the compromise and also the reasons which led to the compromise, as such this court cannot proceed further in this matter.

7.

Given above, the petition is dismissed. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to file a fresh petition and there would be no necessity re-examine the complainant/aggrieved persons and the accused, whose statements stand recorded. The copies of the statements along with report would suffice.

Petition dismissed in the terms mentioned above, with liberty reserved. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 06.02.2023 Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

JYOTI 2023.02.07 09:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.