M/S Sethi Industrial Corporation v. H.U.D.A And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.9313 of 2015 Date of decision: 18.09.2019 M/s Sethi Industrial Corporation ..Petitioner

Versus

HUDA through its Chief Administrator and others ..Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL

Present:

Mr. Rohit Ahuja, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate for the respondents. *** Daya Chaudhary, J. (oral) Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the claim of the petitioner has been considered and impugned order has been recalled. The speaking order has been passed and photocopy of the same has been placed on record. Learned counsel also submits that in case, the petitioner is still aggrieved by any part of the order, he has been given liberty. Keeping in view the submissions made by learned counsel for the respondents, the present writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.

In case, the petitioner is still aggrieved in any manner, he is at liberty to avail the appropriate remedy.

Learned counsel for the respondents undertakes to deposit the cost amount within a period of one week.

(DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 18.09.2019 (SUDHIR MITTAL) neetu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned No Whether Reportable No NEETU RANI 2019.09.20 12:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh