Binder v. State Of Haryana
!
" #$%$ &'
( ( $&" )
(((( $ $ & ) * )%+% ,
!
)- &
((((( %. &" &
'
/0 ( , * 1, 0
2) +32 *$"
&! ) &#$&3 * 1, 05 ( 0
! "#$% % &' & ()*+ #,-.# ./ ,.,- ,.0,$+ 1 '& ) & ,$ 1 ! ()* ' 2)'%33 && & &3' 3 222 2232& & 2* 3
4 5 4 &' +
* 67 $88" && 4 5 ' 2 &
9' * 67 $88"22 &
2* 3&& 1 9 &1:;1 <* &&3 &= -/.
4 5 43 &()*3&3 & * ' &'& & *2 =&3 5' &'2* <
&2 & ) 3'
* &2 &
4 5 4 & 2 2= ' ' :,/ .8 ,.,- & = '&3 ,8 &%&12 &&3 2 &-7.2 && ' 2*
:,/ .8 ,.,- & 2> 9293 &' * 67 $78" &* 2& 2 3& & &3 & & &* & 29 5 2'& *2 ?& '2 3 '2 ) '2 39' * 67 $88"
) &'2 &&'&& '
24 5 43'& '&& &9& ) '2 ' .7 ./ ,.,-&& & ' &-# 3 32'@2 & & 9& 9 2 &2 32 ) & & +1 & 3 35'%3 '
&-$66 3 && * ,..'
2 ?& &' &'2 & &2 &2 '2 &3' 9 = & 6" 4 5 4 ) '2 9 3'
& 5 &'& ) '2 &23&& 2* 3&3 & ! %&& '9
) ' '2 ! -/.
5 2 2& *
& 2 ! && 39' * 67 $88" 3 33&& 5
A 2* & & *2 33 9 =&3 39 & 3 & 3& 2 & 2& 2 2& && 24 5 4
6"
3 '& 2* #&9 ) &9& ! ' .7 ./ ,.,-&&& '-# 32'@2 & & 9& 9 22 32 !
& +1 ?& 2 ' #8+1& &52
! 52'&& '&3 B2 C'&2% % && + $76,.,- &
B2% &
,.-/ " *%* % & /"D3 3&& C'& 2% ? % & 1 + ",7.$,.-/ 23&
B2% %*
,.-88 ,.,.
&
! "
#
23&'
C'&2 % ,"
./ ,.,- & ?& %& + 6/6,0,.,-
B2 C'&2% % && + 77/,.,. &$ %& '
B2 C'&2% % && + /,8,.,- & & '
( B2% % %*
-.#"#,.,- &E )
6( (& &'&52 % %* /,7, ,.,- %* #8,- ,.-6 & '
# %
% %% )
#- ./ ,.,-3 1 3& 3 3 22 &=
)' 1 52 ' &' & ' 3 ? & ' & & '2 22 &=
@6..2'2 #,' &3 2F &' 2 ' &' & 2' ' ''2
7
& 2
?& '&'2 & ' & & 52-7 .- ,.-,'
4'&2% % &&+ -6$,.-, && & (
"
, 85 '2 & 73 '&3
! %&&
?& &2 2 ! 2 2& ",-$/6 ! && 2 '93 3 & ' 3 3
*& '& 52 4'&2%) ( %* 3 ' '3&& 2 3&'' & && = & &52 4'&2 % ( %* 3&3& =3 2 3 =3& ()*
9
3& 33 2 '
2 3
2 3 & 3&&3'
9 2& ",-$/6& A 2&& ,.
.$ ,.,- %*
6#8" ,.,- % 2 -/ ., ,.,. ) 93 3 &()*3 3 -$ ., ,.,.'2 2 20222''
3 2 & 521 % * &3 ' ' !1 % 52 '' 0 & & 23&' &
'
'
?& & 3 #,' &
22&3 '+ $" '93&3&2 3 -/ ., ,.,.' &()*3 -$ ., ,.,.
'3 23 && '
& ' 2
! 3&3
8 2 '3 & ' @3 223&5 & ?& & & 3 22 &= 3
& C'&2%3&& % ' '& ' & & 3&& '
2 ' &0 2 52 ' ) % & & + $76 ,.,- &
4'&2% 3&& 33 -,.9 '
E5G' 22 &= 3& ' &
%3 & &' &'5
% &52 &
,.-/ "
*%* % & /" #8 +1 @' & 3 & 22 & =
! & 52 ! ""
# $ %& '() ') ')
* *
+
$
:
,
-
, * * * ./0$ *
,
+
! &? % & 1 + ",7.$ ,.-/ & 52% %3 2 '
4'&2%
( ,6 ., ,.,- %*
,.-88 ,.,. % % & ' & 33 & 3 3# /9 EG 22 &= ' - 8 2 ! 3&'
4'&2% ,"
./ ,.,- &?& %&
+ 6/6,0,.,- &E
! "
#
+ ! 4'& 2 % ) -, -.
,.,. % &&+ 77/,.,. & $ %& '
+3&&' & & #9/..2EG 2 & ' & & &3&& 9& 9 2&
)% &&+ /,8,.,- & &
'
( 4'&@%
52-7 / ,.,-3&&' &3 = '322 &
% % %*
-.#"# ,.,- & )
2 : #- .# ,.,- 9 & #8+13& &' & & 22 & = 3 2 3 & ' & 3 ,- 523 1(
./0$
Further, a Division Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 31.08.2021 passed in CRM-8262-2021 in CRA-S-3721-SB of 2015 titled as, Harpal Singh v. National Investigating Agency and another, granted suspension of sentence in a case where the recovery was of commercial quantity. In the abovementioned order, the Division Bench had taken into consideration the right vested with an accused person/convict under Article 21 of the Constitution of India with regard to speedy trial. Further, the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in State (NCT of Delhi) v. Lokesh Chadha; (2021) 5 SCC 724 was also taken into account and the provisions of Section 37 of NDPS Act were considered and the sentence
of the applicant-appellant therein was suspended after primarily considering the period of custody of the applicant-appellant therein and also the fact that the appeal was not likely to be heard in near future. Reference in the order was also made to the Division Bench judgment of this Court in Daler Singh v. State of Punjab; 2007 (1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 316 and the view taken in Daler Singh's case (supra) was reiterated and followed. )' 52 3& &' &' 3 ) 2 = 2 #8+1 %9
2 3 '& 2 & = C'&23&&
% ' & & 22 &=
! %& & '& 3 3&' && 2 &
3' 2 3&& &&3 ' & & ' & ' &0 ' &%01
'5 ' = ! &&&'
'
&&3 - ! 3 &&23 & , ! 3 && F0
# ! 3 &&' &% @&& @2 "
! &&22 & 3 22 3 ! && & & 29
22 = 3 22 & % & 23 ) ' ' &&'& ' 2& && ' &' %
3 '&&' & @ 2 &
* 1, 0
;)+ )-
;09 H I ;'&H I