Nirankar Singh v. State Of Punjab And ORS

I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH CWP- 8609- 2016 Dat e of deci si on: - 05. 05. 2016 Ni r ankar Si ngh . . . Pet i t i oner Ver sus St at e of Punj ab and ot her s . . . Respondent s CORAM: HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE S. J. VAZI FDAR, ACTI NG CHI EF JUSTI CE HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE ARUN PALLI Pr esent : - Mr . Ar un Si ngl a, Advocat e, f or t he pet i t i oner .

* * * * S. J. VAZI FDAR, A. C. J. ( ORAL) The pet i t i oner ' s gr i evance i s t hat t he occupat i on cer t i f i cat e has not been i ssued despi t e t he f act t hat t he ent i r e payment has been made and al l t he dues have been t aken car e of .

The appl i cat i on f or t he occupat i on cer t i f i cat e was made about t en year s ago. The pet i t i oner once agai n made an appl i cat i on dat ed 12. 04. 2016 ( Annexur e P- 7) f or t he same. I t i s f or t he r espondent s t o consi der t he appl i cat i on i n t he f i r st i nst ance.

2.

The pet i t i on i s di sposed of by di r ect i ng t he r espondent s t o r espond t o t he pet i t i oner ' s demand f or t he occupat i on cer t i f i cat e cont ai ned l ast l y i n t he l egal not i ce dat ed 12. 04. 2016 ( Annexur e P- 7) i n accor dance wi t h l aw. ( S. J. VAZI FDAR) ACTI NG CHI EF JUSTI CE ( ARUN PALLI ) JUDGE

05. 05. 2016 Amodh AMODH SHARMA 2016.05.06 10:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh