Jagdeep Singh @ Jaggu v. State Of Punjab And Others
!"#
#$%&% ' ( (
) * ( +
+ +
!
" # $
+ + , ( -.!/0 % & ' ()* ! ! "
' ' ' +,-.) /01)/1/% )1.
)/) )/( %(2 %(*,!
/03/. " ' " # " ' / It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody for about 2 years i.e. from 27.07.2021. He submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and rather the name of the father of the petitioner is Narinder Singh and which has been so mentioned as Major Singh in the FIR and there is a doubt with regard to the identity of the petitioner as well. He submitted that be that as it may now all the material
witnesses including the complainant and the son of the complainant have already been examined and none of the witnesses have supported the prosecution version and they have been declared as hostile during the trial. He submitted that the trial of the case may take a long time. He further submitted that the remaining coaccused have already been admitted to bail and therefore the petitioner may be considered for the grant of regular bail.
3.
On the other hand, !
" ' # $ has submitted that it is correct that the petitioner is in custody for about 2 years and all the material witnesses have already been examined and they have not supported the prosecution version. He has however opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner on the ground that the matter is serious in nature. 4.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 5.
It is a case where the petitioner has already suffered incarceration for about 2 years and as per learned counsel for the petitioner, all the material witnesses have already been examined who have not supported the prosecution version and have been declared hostile. Furthermore, ' ' ' '
"4 " '
45 6 , 5 " ! " ' ' ! 7 '4 the present petition is allowed. & ''' ' '
' 3 4 ' '! 3# 4 . 85 4
''
9 " '4" -
+ + 0
1/2 ,
:
;
<3- :
' <3-