Manju v. Raj Kumar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH **** FAO-2717-2013 (O&M) Date of Decision.:27.09.2024 Manju Appellant Vs.
Raj Kumar and Another Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present:
None for the appellant.
Mr. J.S. Cooner, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 & 2.
Mr. Naveen Chopra, Advocate for respondent No.3- Naonal Insurance Co. Ltd.
**** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) There is no representaon on behalf of the appellant. Perusal of the file indicates that appearance for the appellant was lastly made on 11.02.2020. Therea,er, as and when the file was listed for hearing, nobody put in appearance for the appellant on 19.05.2022 & 26.08.2022. The above circumstances indicates that appellant is no longer interested in pursuing this appeal.
Dismissed in default for want of prosecuon.
( DEEPAK GUPTA ) JUDGE September 27, 2024 Neeka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2024.09.27 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document