Archana Ahuja v. Manish Ahuja

FAO No. 1200 of 2014 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

FAO No. 1200 of 2014 Date of Decision: 17.8.2015 Archana Ahuja ..Appellant versus Manish Ahuja ..Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NAVITA SINGH

Present:

Mr. Gurinder Pal Singh, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Sudhir Aggarwal, Advocate, for the respondent.

RAJIVE BHALLA, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the respondent states that the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the appellant and the respondent are residing together.

Counsel for the appellant pleads no instructions. We have considered the statement made by counsel for the respondent and find no reason to doubt the correctness of his statement, made on instructions from Manish Ahuja respondent and consequently, dispose of the appeal as having been rendered infructuous with liberty to the appellant, to seek revival in case the statement made by counsel for the respondent is incorrect. ( RAJIVE BHALLA ) JUDGE ( NAVITA SINGH ) 17.8.2015 JUDGE VK KUMAR VIRENDER 2015.08.19 11:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this docunt High Court Chandigarh