Dr. Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal v. Centre For Research And Industrial Development (Crrid) And Another




    

  


  


 !

"# !$%&%"'( ) 

* +



 ,

 

  
  -

*
 

,  * ,

., 

   





(  /, *
 . *      



    ! 





 

  . *  0 

,

#$$ % %$



  &'#

 ()


+# "

   $   '

 $ , $   " "

    #',          -
.--.

  %

    



( $$"

 

()!$

#       %  /   $ % ( $ )     

( " $0 ) $ ( () 




1#',( 

 $ "



 """


-
-   "$  ( %     

$ "$" $$  $ % ( $ ) /  

-

(      ()

 * 
1#',  

  %% )

($" "$

$) 

& '

  - 3

 $ 

%

 ($" "   

 

 $) % 



  

"

 $$) 4

%    '

 %

 -5
-    "     6"" 

 
7 8 

 

2    


1#', 
- $ $  

$  % " &' #  

 "

  

"  9 

 "

 -.:--5 -.
--;8(   ( %$ % ($"

 


-
-

 * 
        

<$ 



= %  

() $ %  9$

>

'  )  % ( = % 

"  ) < "

 ( $ % ($"

 5 '      $

 $ 

%

 ($" "   

   %

 

%         $($

 ; ! % "  $)   $)


=#', 

$)* $% )  ( 

()

& "'

 



) % $



 #

 0   #

0 

     % $ $ "$

% 

 ) 0  $?

  & % $ !

' $   "

& "'

 @

5

 $ >

 /$ " 

  (    9   " ($ =

 



                      

  

           !          " 

 

  #  $   %    &      &     

  '  ()    *%    +   ,       $     &  $   & *%       

 &'   %

      &    % -   %. '    /  " ,  ' . &       '

   % .   *%     %   

 .

      % 0$%    1            "2 .   $ "   $   /$ " 

  9   ( ()  $

>   

 & " '

       $    (      $

 %

$ $ %

$%   $) %%   )  "9 $ %"

) 

 % A

 

 )

$=$ $  

$

% 9 %  %     

$ $ $   

 % 

  7  $)    

  

   "

 )  9    

  % '

 "      

 

;

 

"

% ) $)    

< $  "



 

  

  "" "


-
-     $      (  $ % ($  

/  $  

   

 

     "

 C '   $   

 $    /$ " 

  9 /  "

    $        (  ( ()  $ +        

 & " '

 +   



% "    

 /$ " 

  %   (  ( ()  

% 

) @ "

 

/   $  

 ()  $      (   ()   

( ()# "$ 0

 

 " $ 

  9  )




1#',

 )

 

%$  ) )

= %



  ()


1#',   

<$  $ % ( $ )"



) -
- :  " / )   

"  $ 

C-



9 =
 ()  ) "8$ 0 $)D$"     

  $ ) "#',

   ) " 8$   0 $) D$" $ " $      /

$

  "  %% @  $

 / )     %

) $""  (/$ " 

%

@ 

" 

.

 ""  $ $

 # 

$)  $( "   

 ( 9  )

/$ ")

%





%( 

  @  $

9$

"

  ) 

$ 



    "$

-

(  

  $$ In my view, there can only be two possibilities i.e. firstly that the process for promotion/redesignation was initiated and the petitioner was not found suitable. There is no challenge to any such process or any decision taken by the CRRID at any point in time. Hence, for the said reason, the petitioner would not have any merit.

 !

$)

1#',)  

" $$ %

8  /  

" $ % ( $ )() 



() $"

""   %

    



 " $$    " $$'  $) 

%   

"$    " $$   

 2  " $$ " 

(  $

   

$ "

 

$ " $    )



9  #',

  " 

 

   @    

     "



 

(( $   

4 6 $ %

   



"$

"

" $$ %

  

& "'

  

( "  

7

%$)  

    $   123 )0

. *  

45 4"4

 

!

% $    3$   !

 %  .  3$