Regional Passport Office, Jalandhar v. Central Administrative Tribunal And ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.9741 of 2015 Date of Decision: May 15, 2015 Regional Passport Office .....Petitioner versus Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BAJANTHRI.

Present: Mr.Rohit Kapoor, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.-

1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) One of the contention raised is that services of 2nd respondent, who was employed on casual basis, were decided to be dispensed with vide notice dated 21.09.1999 on a totally different ground without any reference to his involvement in the criminal case. We, however, find from the impugned order that no such plea was taken before the Tribunal who proceeded on the premise that the services of respondent No.2 were dispensed with due to his involvement in criminal case in which he earned acquittal.

Faced with this, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition at this stage with liberty to move an appropriate application before the Tribunal to raise the above-mentioned MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.05.19 11:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No.9741 of 2015 [2] factual plea.

With liberty aforementioned, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

[SURYA KANT] JUDGE May 15, 2015 [P.B.BAJANTHRI] mohinder JUDGE MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.05.19 11:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh