Mansi And Another v. State Of Punjab And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Writ Petition No. 10279 of 2021 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.10.2021 Mansi and another .......... Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others .......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Gursewak Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Sandeep Singh Deol, DAG, Punjab for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 / State.

Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Advocate for respondent No. 4 - Parveen Kumar.

[ Through Video Conferencing ] **** SURESHWAR THAKUR, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 / 227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of a mandamus hence directing respondent Nos. 2 & 3 to give protection to the life and liberty of the petitioners, and against any interference in the peaceful life of the petitioners being made at the behest of respondent Nos. 4 to 8. The learned State Counsel, does not have any objection, to an order being made by this Court to respondents concerned, to look into and decide through a speaking order, representation Annexure P-5. Consequently, this Court directs respondents concerned, to within three weeks hereafter, hence decide Annexure P-5, through a speaking order.

DINESH KUMAR 2021.10.29 14:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

C.R.W.P. No. 10279 of 2021 (O&M) -2As further prayed for, by the learned counsel for respondent No. 4, respondent No. 3 - SHO concerned, shall arrange a meeting, inter se, lady petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 4. The afore meeting be arranged, within a week hereafter, at a place convenient to both, and in the presence of respondent No. 3 Petition is disposed of.

A copy of this order be given dasti on payment of ususal charges.

October 28, 2021 ( SURESHWAR THAKUR ) 'dk kamra'

JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DINESH KUMAR 2021.10.29 14:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document