M/S Beniwal Trading Co v. State Of Haryana & ORS

I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH CWP- 8937- 2016 Dat e of deci si on: - 09. 05. 2016 M/ s Beni wal Tr adi ng Company . . . Pet i t i oner Ver sus St at e of Har yana and ot her s . . . Respondent s CORAM: HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE S. J. VAZI FDAR, ACTI NG CHI EF JUSTI CE HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE ARUN PALLI Pr esent : - Mr . Char anj i Lal , Advocat e, f or t he pet i t i oner .

* * * * S. J. VAZI FDAR, A. C. J. ( ORAL) The pet i t i oner was al l ot t ed a shop/ boot h i n t he New Veget abl e Mar ket , Madl auda on t he t er ms and condi t i ons cont ai ned i n an al l ot ment l et t er dat ed

28. 05. 2015.

The pet i t i oner accept ed t he al l ot ment wi t hout pr ot est or demur .

Fi ve mont hs l at er , by a l et t er dat ed 15. 10. 2015 ( Annexur e P- 6) , t he pet i t i oner cont ended t hat t he r eser ve pr i ce ought t o have been ` 6, 40, 000/ - and not ` 12, 20, 000/ - . Ther e has been no r esponse t o t hi s l et t er .

2.

The pet i t i on i s, t her ef or e, di sposed of by di r ect i ng t he r espondent s t o r epl y t o t he pet i t i oner ' s l et t er dat ed 15. 10. 2015 ( Annexur e P- 6) wi t hi n f our weeks f r om t oday. 3.

I t i s cl ar i f i ed t hat i f t he pet i t i oner does not make payment of t he i nst al l ment s as per t he l et t er of al l ot ment , i t does so at i t s own r i sk. Thi s or der ought not t o be const r ued as a st ay of t he payment of i nst al l ment s. ( S. J. VAZI FDAR) ACTI NG CHI EF JUSTI CE ( ARUN PALLI ) JUDGE

09. 05. 2016 Amodh AMODH SHARMA 2016.05.10 12:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh