Raysari v. State Of Haryana And Another

I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH CWP- 8986- 2016 Dat e of deci si on: - 17. 05. 2016 Smt . Raysar i . . . Pet i t i oner Ver sus St at e of Har yana and anot her . . . Respondent s CORAM: HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE S. J. VAZI FDAR, ACTI NG CHI EF JUSTI CE HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE ARUN PALLI Pr esent : - Mr . Sandeep Thakan, Advocat e, f or t he pet i t i oner .

* * * * S. J. VAZI FDAR, A. C. J. ( ORAL) The pet i t i oner had appl i ed f or al l ot ment of a f l at under t he BPL cat egor y. She had deposi t ed a sum of ` 44, 000/ - on

21. 08. 2013 by a bank dr af t . The pet i t i oner appear s t o have been unsuccessf ul i n t he dr aw of l ot s. However , t he r espondent s have not r ef unded t he amount deposi t ed by her despi t e t he l egal not i ce dat ed 01. 02. 2016.

2.

The r espondent s concer ned ar e, t her ef or e, di r ect ed t o t ake a deci si on i n r espect of t he pet i t i oner ' s demand cont ai ned i n t he wr i t pet i t i on i ncl udi ng by t he l et t er dat ed 01. 02. 2016 by 30. 06. 2016.

3.

I n t he event of t he pet i t i oner bei ng f ound t o be el i gi bl e f or r ef und, t he r espondent s shal l r ef und t he amount t oget her wi t h i nt er est , i f any, l at est by 15. 07. 2016. ( S. J. VAZI FDAR) ACTI NG CHI EF JUSTI CE ( ARUN PALLI ) JUDGE

17. 05. 2016 Amodh AMODH SHARMA 2016.05.17 16:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh