Pushap Jain And ANR v. State Of Punjab And Others

CRM-M No. 45784 of 2021 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CRM-M No. 45784 of 2021 Date of Decision: 25.2.2022 Pushap Jain and another ......Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR

Present:

Ms. Prabhneer Swani, Advocate for Mr. D.S.Sobti, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Bhupender Beniwal, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. S.S.Madaan, Advocate for respondents No. 4 to 6.

**** SURESHWAR THAKUR , J.

(ORAL) 1.

Prayer in the present petition is for a direction being made, upon the investigating officer concerned, to expeditiously conclude the investigations into FIR No. 128 dated 29.4.2017, registered at Police Station Salem Tabri, Ludhiana, constituting therein offences embodied under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, 34 IPC.

2.

The learned State counsel submits before this Court, that the afore relief, as claimed in the petition, does not survive, and, the petition becomes infructuous, as, after completion of investigations into the offences (supra), by the investigating officer concerned, the latter has proceeded to institute an affirmative report under Section 173 Cr.P.C., before the learned Magistrate concerned, and, against the accused.

3.

Consequently, the instant petition is disposed of as becoming GURPREET SINGH 2022.02.25 14:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh infructuous.

CRM-M No. 45784 of 2021 -24.

However, liberty is reserved to the accused concerned, to in accordance with law, seek a direction of the learned Magistrate concerned for further investigations into the FIR concerned. (SURESHWAR THAKUR) JUDGE February 25, 2022 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

Yes/No GURPREET SINGH 2022.02.25 14:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh