Sheela Bansal And ORS v. State Of Punjab And ORS

I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH CWP- 9032- 2016 Dat e of deci si on: - 10. 05. 2016 Sheel a Bansal and ot her s . . . Pet i t i oner s Ver sus St at e of Punj ab and ot her s . . . Respondent s CORAM: HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE S. J. VAZI FDAR, ACTI NG CHI EF JUSTI CE HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE ARUN PALLI Pr esent : - Mr . Kashi sh Gar g, Advocat e, f or t he pet i t i oner s.

* * * * S. J. VAZI FDAR, A. C. J. ( ORAL) The pet i t i oner s cont end t hat t he enhancement has wr ongl y been demanded f or t he r eason t hat i t has been comput ed on t he ent i r e l and admeasur i ng about 47 acr es, al t hough t he Ref er ence Cour t gr ant ed t he r ef er ence onl y i n r espect of 30 acr es.

The ot her cont ent i ons have al so been r ai sed i n t he pet i t i oner s' r epr esent at i on dat ed 10. 09. 2015 ( Annexur e P- 6) . The same r ef er s t o var i ous document s and mat er i al obt ai ned by t he pet i t i oner s under t he Ri ght t o I nf or mat i on Act , 2005. I t woul d be appr opr i at e f or t he r espondent s t o t ake a deci si on i n t hi s r egar d bef or e consi der i ng t he pet i t i oner s' cl ai m di r ect l y i n t hi s wr i t pet i t i on.

2.

The wr i t pet i t i on i s, t her ef or e, di sposed of by di r ect i ng t he r espondent s t o r espond t o t he pet i t i oner s'

r epr esent at i on dat ed 10. 09. 2015 ( Annexur e P- 6) . ( S. J. VAZI FDAR) ACTI NG CHI EF JUSTI CE ( ARUN PALLI ) JUDGE

10. 05. 2016 Amodh AMODH SHARMA 2016.05.12 11:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh