Randhir Sahai v. Jalandhar Improvement Trust And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH

Sr. No.: 206 Civil Writ Petition No.9910 of 2015 Date of Decision: September 18, 2015 Randhir Sahai ..... PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

Jalandhar Improvement Trust, Jalandhar & others ..... RESPONDENT(S) . . .

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH . . .

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? . . .

PRESENT: - Mr.

Sandeep Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Sagina, Advocate, for Mr. Sandeep Khunger, Advocate, for respondent No.1.

. . .

Surya Kant, J (Oral) 1.

The petitioner alongwith proforma respondent Nos.3 to 21 seek modification of the Award dated 13.10.2012 passed by the President, Improvement Trust, Jalandhar whereby the compensation @ ` 12,000/- and ` 15,000/- per marla has been awarded for the land acquired for '94.5 Acre Development Scheme'.

AVIN KUMAR 2015.10.13 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh

CWP No.9910 of 2015 [2] 2.

Notice of motion was issued. Learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the above mentioned award was subject matter of challenge before this Court in a bunch of writ petitions including CWP No.3980 of 2013 (Prem Kumar vs. Tribunal, Jalandhar Improvement Trust, Jalandhar) which were allowed in part vide order dated 31.10.2013 in the following terms:- "........39. In view of our discussion above, the writ petitions filed by the claimants are partly allowed. The award of the Tribunal dated 13.10.2012 is modified to the extent that compensation for the land abutting the bye-pass (240' x 2265') is assessed @ Rs.16,080/- per marla and of the remaining land @ Rs.13,400/- per marla with all statutory benefits under Sections 23 & 28 of the Land Acquisition Act on the difference of the market value of acquired land over and above the compensation awarded by the Tribunal.......". 3.

The instant writ petition is also thus allowed in part in the above reproduced terms ordered accordingly. (Surya Kant) Judge (Jaspal Singh) September 18, 2015 Judge avin AVIN KUMAR 2015.10.13 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh