Estate Officer Union Terriotery Chandigarh v. Ram Kishore

CWP No. 9114 of 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No. 9114 of 2016 Date of decision : 08.08.2017 Estate Officer, UT. Chd.

....Petitioner V/s Ram Kishore & anr.

....Respondents BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Suvir Sehgal, Advocate with Mr. Jaivir S. Chandail, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms Naiya Gill, Advocate for respondent no. 1. RAJAN GUPTA J.

Present writ petition is directed against the order dated 28.07.2011 (Annexure P-7), passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat (Public Utility Services) whereby respondent no. 1 has been declared eligible for allotment of alternate site and petitioner has been directed to allot the same. At the outset, it is submitted that all connected matters have been disposed of by a coordinate bench in CWP No. 15419 of 2011, decided on 26.04.2017, with liberty to the private respondents to file appeal before the Chief Executive Officer in terms of Section 17 of Scheme of 2016. As a result, the impugned order passed by Permanent Lok Adalat (PUS) is hereby set-aside. If any allotment has been made pursuant to the direction given, same shall not be disturbed till respondent no. 1 exhausts the remedy of appeal.

The Chief Executive Officer would decide the issue after considering all the relevant material on record being conscious of all the facts and circumstances of the case. In case respondent Ajay Kumar 2017.08.12 13:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document no.

CWP No. 9114 of 2016 copy of the order, no question of limitation shall be raised by the appellate authority.

Disposed of.

August 08, 2017 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No Ajay Kumar 2017.08.12 13:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document