Raseed v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-38031-2024 Date of Decision : August 20, 2024 RASEED -PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA -RESPONDENT

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI

Present:

Mr. Kuldeep Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rajesh Gaur, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

*** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) 1.

Through the instant petition, as instituted under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C., the petitioner seeks the concession of anticipatory bail, in case FIR No.60 dated 16.02.2024, under Section 379 of the IPC (Sections 201, 34, 411 of the IPC added subsequently), registered at P.S. Central Faridabad, District Faridabad.

2.

After addressing arguments for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the instant petition, however, with liberty to the petitioner to surrender before the learned trial Court concerned and to make an application for bail before the latter, which may be directed to be decided expeditiously. 3.

Leave granted.

4.

Consequently, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn, however, with liberty to the petitioner to surrender before the DEVINDER YADAV 2024.08.22 09:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CRM-M-38031-2024 learned trial Court concerned upto 11.09.2024, and thereupon, if he makes an application before the latter for grant of bail, the latter shall decide the same within three days, but, after affording adequate opportunity of hearing to the opposite party.

(KULDEEP TIWARI) August 20, 2024 JUDGE devinder Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No DEVINDER YADAV 2024.08.22 09:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment