← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/35157/2019allowed

Santosh Jain v. State Of Punjab

2019-11-27Mr. Justice Surinder Gupta2 pages

CRM-M-35157 of 2019 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1.

CRM-M-35157 of 2019 Date of Decision: 27.11.2019 Santosh Jain ....Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Punjab ....Respondent 2.

CRM-M-37310 of 2019 Preeti Jain ....Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Punjab ....Respondent 3.

CRM-M-37316 of 2019 Amit Jain ....Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocate for the petitioners in all the petitions.

Mr. Avtar Singh Sandhu, Addl. A.G. Punjab.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) Present petitions have been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No. 117 dated 17.07.2019 registered for offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Punjab Agriculture University (PAU), District Police Commissionerate Ludhiana, District Ludhiana.

Heard.

JITENDER KUMAR 2019.11.27 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-35157 of 2019 -2Learned State counsel on instructions from SI Prem Lal submits that the petitioners have joined the investigation and their custodial interrogation is no more required for the purpose of further investigation of the case.

In view of submission of learned State counsel but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, these petitions are allowed and orders dated 28.08.2019 and 05.09.2019 passed in respective petitions are made absolute till the presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:- (i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by the police as and when required; (ii) that the petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against them so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.

(iv) that the petitioners will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court.

November 27, 2019 ( SURINDER GUPTA ) jk JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No JITENDER KUMAR 2019.11.27 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh