High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/17636/2023disposed of

Anita v. State Of Punjab And Others

2023-09-192 pages

2023:PHHC:122826

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-17636-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.09.2023 Anita . . . . Petitioner Vs.

State of Punjab and others . . . . Respondents **** CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ****

Present:

Mr. H.C. Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab.

**** SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State are ad idem that the writ petition raises the same question of law and issues which have been already decided by this Court in CWP-16667-2023 in Rimpi Garg and others vs. State of Punjab and others decided on 10.08.2023, and in CWP-17287-2023 in Ashu Rani vs. State of Punjab and others decided on 10.08.2023, wherein this Court passed the following order:

"3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the notice of counselling was issued subject to pending litigation and therefore, the petitioner was waiting for the result. However, this Court finds that the petitioner did not file writ petition till the case was decided with respect to the other candidates who had approached timely un this Court in 2013. They are the fence sitters who have been watching the game and have taken steps only after the game is over. Such fence standing persons ought not to be entertained by this Court as a petitioner is required to be vigilant about his rights. In the said order, Distt. Education Officer took into consideration all the aspects including the fact that there is no vacancy for MOHIT GOYAL 2023.09.19 17:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-17636-2023 (O&M) 2023:PHHC:122826 the petitioners in the district and the selection process is already over long back.

4. In view thereof, the order passed by Distt. Education Officer does not warrant any interference. Writ petition is found to be without merits and accordingly dismissed."

2. In view of above, present writ petition is also disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

3. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE September 19, 2023 Mohit goyal

1. Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes/No

2. Whether reportable?

Yes/No MOHIT GOYAL 2023.09.19 17:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document