Harbhajan Kaur Etc. v. Jot Singh Etc.

 

  


   

   



 ! "#"$  % &

 ! "#"$ 

'  ("

""""""))**+ ,

"



(

  ("

"""""")  , -!

 ./ -("

(  (

(-    
 
  

 


 



  


(

(-

"

!

 
 
"

#

$ 
  %& '

%'

 
"

 

#
 # 
!#"



"

# 
 #
##
#

#
((



)#

&** +

,
!#"

-.

  

  #
 

  #




 



'''/0

$#
#
1
2 34




 

 

 
#
#


)# 
#
  
%( '2 %'

%



# 

 # #
#


 
#
# 
5




  #
$ 
"

 
!#"



 #

  #


 


 
#

5 #

"
 


 6

"# (- ((  ( 

/   (/






(

!
 
 


 #

0  

  



"

 
!#"


#


$
#

 
"
 
!

 
 


 
"
$




  #
"
 


 
 $

8
 

 

 
!#"


 

#  ##

 


 
9
##

#

  !#"


 


#

# #


##


  
 #



 


 


 
 
 


$  
 
 

$ 
 
#
"
 




   #


"

 
!#"


 
#
"
 

!

 

# # 




( 9
 
 
 
 


 

 
 $


#
 
$#
#
"
# 

(

/ /0 

- ( 

8-"
  
 
#

 

Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another 12#3  (%) 4 % , +  5 #
$

 $

 

  #


 
  
 





0 :30
  

      

      

   

         

  

  

  
  





 



  

 

  

        

    !"#$     

%#  !"&$      

&'    !"($     




31
)

      

        *              (+,      

    







                 


 -

 

           

        

   

         $          .  /

 

     

     

            

  
*  

 

             



         

     
32
 

     

           (+,       

6    

           (+,    

    
             

  

                                         

 

           
* * * * * * 42.)     

  

       &$        

     0

 1    $        !2    !(%+ %!%(

$ 

    

 3!4 %'#+

3!'#!#(

3!(#'&+

3!&&!&(

 3!#&'(+

  

    

 3!!(!((

35(''+

34 '!'(

 3(''4+

*

8-"
  
 
#

 

National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. 12 73  ( 85
 
 ##
 $

#
((
( 
(*



)#

&**
 
$#
0 + .

; #

 

##
<
  #

## =

$ +>.

#


##
#


  = +.



 

"

#

#

##= +;.

  "
# 

# 
 


 

 


#


  
< $#
 #= +?.

@  



 #



 #

$#



A"=
0 

#<  !
 
#


A  
#
 

0 :52. 6  conventional heads



  

   

 7/

8
*   7
%(+++   

7

!+++++    

        7  !+++++  

  

   


  

      

 

 
7/

 0   9 

 



         



             

  



   



 
:    

  

    
6         
       

 

     



  

      


   

  

  

 

  


; 

  

    

  

 

  

       

    

        



                     

  
    

   

 * 

           

 

         

   

  

   

 

      

   7
!(+++
&++++ 7
!(+++

 
           

  
<       

   

 )       

    

 

 



  

  

 !+,   

)   

  



  

 

 

  = = = = = 59.3
)   

  (+,    



 



 /      &+

  


   #+, 





&+(+

* 

  

7   (+'+

    !(,
       


59.4
* 







 $      &+,

 

  

  

 &+

6  %(,

  

 &+(+

 !+,

  

 (+'+



 

 


   

   

     

 
59.5
.              

    

     #+#%0> ?

    

    59.6.



               0  > @         &%     /


59.7
 

       
59.8
7   

        

  



 

     

    7  !(+++  7  &++++     7  !(+++

 
 

    

   !+,  

A

8 & 8-"
  
 
#

 

-+94+   +*

% + & 4)+ :

/;4;,

<"

+ % +4 +*;+ =%= % +4  ,=  1 82 83 ( 5


##

(+ *+ < 4+
2%) +3

 + +:

(,=;

2(%) +3 


 $
 #
#

 
  





 

0 B21
6  <

  C  0 8        

 

    

;

  

  
 *     

  D  D    

      



 D  

 D  D    D     D

 D
    

          

  

   

 

  

   )

 

 

 





%!
!
Spousal consortium 

   

         

    



      

  

    /  D
%!
%
Parental consortium     



  

D  

   

     

   

     D

# %!
#
Filial consortium     

  

 

  


6 

      

         


  

   



   

      

          

 
22
  



 

     

       3  /     

 



  E   

  

   

      
 3   /                 

      

 

    
     

 

  

      


23
 3>  

6  

    

     

  

  

  

* 

  

         

     

 

     
C  

   

     

    6 
6   

  

    
   

      

       

   

           

   

 24
        

         

     

 

   D

  D   C  0 8
*  







    

  7 &++++ 

  '

 


$ 
$
 

 
$ 
 

" 
%'
 


!
 
$ 


"

  
   

#
 ##
#

 #

"
 
#



8$
 

 
#
$ 
 
5




!
 
!#"


 
#
"# #
#


# 


 

 7%''/0



 
!#"


 
 #

#

#
 
 #

 6


 

# 


 
"
6# #
#$
#
 #
5

## #

  
 #
#

9
#
$

 
#
 
##
 

5

##  #



 

 $


# 
# 
"


  # 
"

6 

  

9
#
 
# 
#
  

A  


8-"
  
 
#
"Yashodamma S. Vs.

Regional Manager, Reliance General Ins. Co. Ltd. and another, 2023 ACJ 605> #


'& %'%%
$#

8-"
<
 
$# ##

 



 



# 



   #



 %''''/0
!
 
 

:Yashodamma's case (supra)


 

0 B4
36    

       

  



  

36    

    /



 

 7
%++++     

%#

 



   (+    

    

 
      

 

       F!2G
#%&++++
;    

         

   
A %

9


 
##

  

 

  
 
 
#
 #
<


  

  
 ##
#
 
 
#
# 


 # 
# 


 #



" ?@ )

4 ,=

 
 


$ 
 
 
 
!#"


 
#

#




  



# 

  
!
#
 
$#


 $

  #
 #
 




 
6A
#

"



 
  


@ 
 


$ 
 
 

 
!#"


 
#
# #



##
 6#
#
 



  

# 

##
#
#
 
 
"
*
# 



 $




$ 

  
<

  



#

#


$
#



"  
!

$ 
5 #
# 

#
 

   /( 

9
#$


 $
 #
$
"

8-"
  
 
# 
"


A  


 
#
$
!
$  
%& '

%'

#
##
#
!
 0 #


 #

 
  #



  #


 0 Sr. No.

Heads Compensation Awarded 
9  ''''/0 % @  

1
7'4  7'''/0
+7'4

''''.

; #
$ 
 
<#  /%
 2'''/0
+ 7'''
B
/%.

! 
9 
 2'''/0
+ 7'''02'''.

##
* (




;
 3 %'''/0
+2'''
B
%
B
*.

C

?   * 3'/0 * @  
?<  * 3'/0 & C

#

@## 







 7*7''
<

 73%''/0 '

,+* 4) +,;

" ?#?$@  %&,;


$ 
"

!#"

"??@ %  =+ &

+4% , " ??$@ 2 ?#?$??3 (


 


#
 
#



"
8-"   
 
#
Dara Singh @ Dhara Banjara Vs. Shyam Singh Varma  #   7

R.Valli and Others VS. Tamil Nandu State Transport Corporation (2022) 5 Supreme Court Cases 107 ?


 0 #


  

#
1
&4





 




  
##

 #
##
#

 

#
 #D #

!
9  
  0

#
#

# 
 



  #

$#
#
$#

!#"

$##

#

$



#



#
A  
!

  !#"


#
#

#"



 



  #
 $#
#
#

 


 #

/  


 #
 "

 
!#"


#
#
$ 
 
%& '

%'

!  #

/  

#

 #
#
"

6
 
 #

 !#"

*

#
# #
+.
#


 
#


"#"$

2(

(-3 



E
 6#/0 6#


F/
E
 "


F