Rahul Raj Singh And ANR v. State Of Haryana And ORS

CWP-17494-2023 & -1CWP-23927-2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17494-2023 Date of Decision: 04.12.2024 Rahul Raj Singh and another

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others ...Respondent(s) With CWP-23927-2023 Ishita Kirar and others

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- None for the petitioners Mr. Krishan K. Chahal, Addl. AG, Haryana Mr. Naman Jain, Advocate, and Mr. Pramjeet Singh, Advocate for private respondents no.2 & 3 TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) These petitions have been filed seeking a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 28.07.2022, whereby the third respondent was given temporary charge as Principal, Institute of Hotel Management, Faridabad. PAYAL 2024.12.05 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-17494-2023 & -2CWP-23927-2023 2.

Learned counsel for respondents no.2 & 3 contends that the matter has been rendered infructuous since, vide office order dated 19.09.2024, joining report dated 29.07.2024 submitted by Sh. Atul Shukla as Principal, IHM, Faridabad, has been accepted subject to final outcome of SLP (C) No.30017 2024. Accordingly, the third respondent does not hold the temporary charge as Principal any longer.

3.

On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for respondents no.2 & 3 had made a similar statement, but the matter was adjourned since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Today also, none appears on their behalf.

4.

In view of the statement made by learned counsel for respondents no.2 & 3, it is apparent that the matter has been rendered infructuous, and the petitions accordingly stand disposed of as such. 5.

A photocopy of this order be placed on connected file. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 04.12.2024 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PAYAL 2024.12.05 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document