Chanchal And ORS v. Rajesh And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : 30.01.2018 Chanchal and others ... Appellant(s)

Versus

Rajesh and others ... Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Mr. Parmod Parmar, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Sanjeev Kodan, Advocate for respondent No.3.

**** AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL) CM-3276-CII-2015 For the reasons stated in the application, which is supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed and the delay of 52 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

FAO-1216-2015 The appeal has been preferred by the claimants being widow, minor children and mother of Parmod, who unfortunately died in a motor accident occurred on 14.03.2013, for enhancement of compensation against the Award passed by the Tribunal, whereby a compensation of `10,59,800/- along with interest @ 7.5% per annum, has been awarded. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellantsclaimants submits that the Tribunal has awarded the compensation to the tune of `10,59,800/-, which is on lower side as the deceased-Parmod aged

30 years employed with Bansal Motors and also doing part time job of Accountancy in Balaji Motors, Rohtak Road, Sonepat and was earning `11,600/- per month, but the Tribunal took the income of the deceased as `6,600/-.

Moreover, no increase was made in the salary towards future prospects and an amount of `20,000/- towards loss of consortium, `10,000/- for funeral expenses and `20,000/- for loss of estate, is also too meagre, thus, there is scope for enhancement.

On the other hand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Insurance Company submits that the Tribunal has taken care of all the heads sufficiently and there is no scope for further enhancement, thus, urges this Court for dismissal of the appeal.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and appraised the paper book and of the view that there is a scope of enhancement as the compensation to the tune of `10,59,800/- is on lower side as no increase towards future prospects has been made. Accordingly, I take the income of the deceased as `6,600/- per month as has been taken by the Tribunal and provided 40% increase towards future prospects and apply a multiplier of '17', much less, deduction of 1/4th to assess the loss of dependency as `14,13,720/-. I will further add to it `70,000/- towards conventional heads i.e. loss of consortium, loss of estate and funeral expenses as per the latest judgment dated 31.10.2017 rendered by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in SLP (Civil) No.25590 of 2014 titled as "National Insurance Company Ltd. V/s Pranay Sethi and others".

In all the compensation payable shall be `14,83,720/-. The amount in excess over what has already been provided by the Tribunal shall

also attract interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the appeal till its realization. The enhanced amount shall be distributed amongst the appellants-claimants in the ratio of 2:2:2:1. The liability shall remain the same as has already been determined by the Tribunal. The award passed by the Tribunal is modified to the above extent and the appeal stands allowed.

( AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE 30.01.2018  Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No  Whether Reportable Yes/ No