Vikramjit Shorey v. State Of Punjab & ORS

CWP No.3566 of 2017 {1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.3566 of 2017 Date of decision:14.11.2017 Vikramjit Shorey, Advocate ... Petitioner Vs.

State of Punjab and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr. M.K.Dogra, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Rameeza Hakeem, Addl.A.G.Punjab.

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

In this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus for directing/commanding the respondents to fill up 10 posts of Members in various District Consumer Forum in the State of Punjab, as mandated under Rule 12-A of the Consumer Protection Rules, 1987.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that certain events had taken place during the pendency of the present writ petition and thus, in view thereof, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such.

Savita 2017.11.15 14:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CWP No.3566 of 2017 {2} 3.

Ordered accordingly.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (AMIT RAWAL) November 14, 2017 JUDGE savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Savita 2017.11.15 14:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh