Shri Ram v. Chandigarh Administration Chd Thr Adviser To Administration & ORS

I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH CWP- 9486- 2016 Dat e of deci si on: - 16. 05. 2016 Shr i Ram . . . Pet i t i oner Ver sus Chandi gar h Admi ni st r at i on and ot her s . . . Respondent s CORAM: HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE S. J. VAZI FDAR, ACTI NG CHI EF JUSTI CE HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE ARUN PALLI Pr esent : - Mr . Shekhar Chaudhar y, Advocat e, f or t he pet i t i oner .

* * * * S. J. VAZI FDAR, A. C. J. ( ORAL) The r espondent s al l ot t ed a t enement t o t he pet i t i oner as wel l as one Smt . Anj al i j oi nt l y. The pet i t i oner cl ai ms t o be ent i t l ed t o t he same i n hi s name al one. He st at es t hat t he sai d Smt . Anj al i i f at al l i s ent i t l ed t o a separ at e al l ot ment . He f ur t her st at es t hat he i s nei t her r el at ed t o her , nor ever occupi ed t he pr emi ses j oi nt l y wi t h her .

The r espondent s, however , by a l et t er of al l ot ment dat ed 16. 05. 2001 al l ot t ed a const r uct ed si t e upt o pl i nt h l evel bear i ng No. 3686, Sect or 25, Chandi gar h t o t hem j oi nt l y. A r epr esent at i on dat ed 24. 11. 2015 ( Annexur e P- 5) i n t hat r egar d i s pendi ng wi t h t he r espondent s. However , f or some r eason, not hi ng was done f or f our t een year s. 2.

The pet i t i on i s, t her ef or e, di sposed of by di r ect i ng t he r espondent s t o deci de t he pet i t i oner ' s appl i cat i on i n i t s t ur n. The aut hor i t i es, however , must consi der t he pet i t i oner ' s appl i cat i on onl y af t er af f or di ng t he sai d Smt . Anj al i al so an oppor t uni t y of bei ng hear d as t her e may be a possi bi l i t y of conf l i ct i ng i nt er est s.

( S. J. VAZI FDAR) ACTI NG CHI EF JUSTI CE ( ARUN PALLI ) JUDGE

16. 05. 2016 Amodh AMODH SHARMA 2016.05.17 11:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh