Jai Kanwar v. State Of Haryana And Others

CWP-19214-2026 -23.

Respondent No.6 filed an appeal before the Commissioner under Section 51 of 1994 Act. Vide impugned order, Commissioner accepted the appeal and has set aside the order passed by Deputy Commissioner.

4.

Having heard counsel for the parties and from the perusal of the impugned order, this Court finds that the order passed by the Commissioner is completely vague as the same does not meet with the reasonings recorded by the Deputy Commissioner while removing respondent No.6. 5.

With the consent of the counsels representing the parties, the impugned order dated 03.04.2026 passed by the Commissioner, Rohtak Division, Rohtak, is hereby set aside. He is directed to decide the appeal afresh in accordance with law.

6.

Counsels representing the parties are ad idem that during the pendency of the appeal before the Commissioner, operation of the order of removal of respondent No.6 from the post of Sarpanch, remained in abeyance.

6.1.

Accordingly, it is ordered that the removal of respondent No.6 be kept in abeyance till the date the appeal is finally decided. 7.

The Commissioenr shall decide the appeal expeditiously preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

CWP-19214-2026 -38.

The parties shall appear before the Commissioner on 15.07.2026.

9.

The instant writ petition is accordingly, disposed off. 10.

Needless to say, nothing observed herein shall be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. The appeal shall be decided in accordance with law without being prejudiced by any observation made in this order.

July 01, 2026 (Pankaj Jain) Dpr Judge Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No