← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/28987/2018disposed of

M/S Vijay Son Rice And General Mills, Moga v. State Of Punjab & ORS

2023-12-12Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 2023:PHHC:158500 CWP No.28987 of 2018 Date of Decision:12.12.2023 M/S VIJAY SON RICE AND GENERAL MILLS, MOGA ....Petitioner vs.

STATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:

Mr. Varun Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Inderpreet Singh Kang, AAG, Punjab *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 06.12.2011 (Annexure P-1) whereby Director, Food Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Punjab has raised a demand of Rs. 5,93,966.50/- alongwith interest @ 12 % per annum.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that impugned order was allegedly passed on 20.12.2011 whereas it was communicated to petitioner on 27.04.2018. As per the said impugned order, the amount determined by Director would be recovered by filing civil suit. The State has not filed civil suit against the petitioner still appropriated a sum of Rs. 5,14,514/- which petitioner deposited under compelled circumstances. As per communication dated 30.10.2010, the respondent has calculated PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2023.12.12 17:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CWP No.28987 of 2018 -2- 2023:PHHC:158500 principal amount due against the petitioner Rs. 2,42,219/- whereas by impugned order, the principal amount has been increased to 5,93,966.50/-. The contradiction between the two documents is stark. 3.

Learned State counsel submits that petitioner vide communication dated 17.10.2011 accepted his liability and deposited admitted liability. The petitioner is trying to deflect from his liability. 4.

Without commenting upon merits of the case and considering the fact that as per memo dated 30.10.2010, the principal amount due against the petitioner has been assessed Rs. 2,42,219/-, the respondents are directed to re-calculate the correct liability of the petitioner and appropriate from the already paid amount. The calculation shall be made within three months from today after granting opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 5.

The petition stands disposed of in above terms. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 12.12.2023 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2023.12.12 17:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment