Jagdish Parsad And Others v. State Of Haryana And Another

CWP No.22869 of 2019 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.22869 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision.28.08.2019 SI Jagdish Parsad and others

...Petitioners

Vs State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

Present:

Mr. Suresh Kumar Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL -.- AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that without show cause notice pay of the petitioner has been re-fixed vide impugned order (Annexure P-4), resulting into deduction. However, while going through Annexure P-4 refixing of pay with a margin of Rs.100/-, reasonings are not forthcoming.

I am of the view that it is fit case where Department may be represented by petitioners to express their grievance and assign reasoning and if they feel aggrieved with same, approach this Court for redressal of their grievance.

At this stage, learned counsel for petitioners seeks liberty to approach respondents by filing representation. In case such representation is filed within a period of two weeks from today, respondents shall decide the same within a period of two months after affording opportunity of personal hearing to all petitioners and pass a speaking order thereon. In case representation is not decided as directed by this Court, there shall be imposition of costs of `25,000/- to be paid to the petitioners from personal account of officer/official found responsible for not deciding the same. This PANKAJ KUMAR 2019.09.02 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP No.22869 of 2019 (O&M) -2condition of imposing costs is only to prevent petitioner to run from pillar to post and avail remedy of contempt in case of non-compliance of directions issued by this Court. In case representation is submitted within two weeks, Department without deciding representation will not cause further reduction.

The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE August 28, 2019 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No PANKAJ KUMAR 2019.09.02 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document