← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaFAO/2161/2014disposed of

Suresh And ORS v. Rahish And ORS

2022-05-13Mrs. Justice Manjari Nehru Kaul6 pages



     

  !

!"#$%&'& 

 

  

  

$  ()

*& *  

+ )    



      



    

   

    

 !"#$" % 

&   '





  

 

()* 

+

  

$   ' ,,,,

 

+ ),& )

'-    

   

    %   . 

'   % ++ 

%

            /  

     

      '

     0



 

 %



0 

+ 

  

 

   

0 

   

$

0   '  0 

 2  /

 '

 



'        3 0 /

 4 "$" (    + -0

'

5 

  6

67    

  44    8##        '

'

 '   4 (#%491:!%;

 



    < - 

  4 (#%491'

/

' 1 *.& "& /!

0"1#2  *   =%""91 $

*  $>=%""? %="""91 @  = - 

*   %="""91 A  5%";7  $!"""91

A

 $!"""91  = # - A

 $!"""> =? (!#"""91 8 .  +  " @ + 

@  0   $ "#%4 $ @ B>  $%"""91 .  B  = - +

 4 (#%491 $

  0  

 =

% 

$"  0$"" 3 0'

 



 

     0  /  C1(#.9( ( 5 

  6

 67  

// 



     '

       /  

    - /   '

     '  0  

 

$$"%$"  @*0  /!#

 %"%$" 



$!8D((# *+'

/   

 



/  

 

   0$    /

  E   *'

 

'

 /  

 $""""91  /



 / .       

 9

   

  / ' /  /   '

  ' C 0 

   $$   / '



0  

   



0  # C 0 

  0

 

'

   =%""91'



'    '

/    F 



  0'

 %$""91 .         

    

       

G     >  

 

    

 0



E 0

 /    ' National Insurance Co. Vs. Pranay Sethi, 2017 SCC 270 and Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Nanu Ram alias Chuhru Ram & Ors., 2018(4) RCR (Civil) 333. 4.

On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3 - Insurance Co., while opposing the submissions made by counsel opposite, submits that the two minor sisters of the deceased Bablu i.e. appellants No.3 & 4, were not entitled to any filial consortium. He further contends that  0  



 0/  0 



/    : =%""91

  /     0 /    C





 0-    '

/ 

'



  . '

'  0  

 

0 

 /                    

 

  

  

1

  '     

    ' *

   

        +    '   0   

 0 

 

 

0 



' 0 # $$   /   E     '

/    0  F  

  %$""91

'   ' E0

 /  @ 

 '



 

'     '  0 

  -   

E    0    

     

  '

/ 

  +   3 C 60   + Pranay Sethi's case (supra)   C 60    +   Pranay Sethi's case (supra)

E

       %"""91 0

     >  

 =""""91 

  

0

  ' 0  0  ";



    

 ' 0  ";







 

 0

 C 60+ Rasmita Biswal and others Vs. Divisional Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd. and another : 2022(1) RCR(Civil) 344    '

Pranay Sethi's case(supra). Hence, the amount of compensation under the conventional heads stands modified to Rs.16,500/- each, for loss of estate & funeral expenses. Besides this, 

 '

 

'        =="""91       Since, the Tribunal did not award any compensation qua future prospects, the appellants-claimants are also entitled to future prospects to the extent of 40% keeping in mind the age of the deceased, who was 22 years old. 8.

Resultantly, the compensation is re-assessed as follows:-

 *.& "& /!

0"1#2  *   %$""91 $

*  $>%$""? 4$=""91 @  5=";7  4$="">=";? $=84"91 = - 

*   #!(4"91 A  '

 

>  5H7  $ #="91

A

 4%%$"91  # # - A

 4%%$"> #?  !8(4"91 8 @ + 

@  ##"""915 =="""91 " 0 /       '      ##"""915 =="""91 @ B>   4%""91 $ .  B    4%""91 ( - +

  (##(4"91

  

    (##(4"91 

 /'  :#;

 

     < 0   

 

   I                 

   0   

+ )



/3%,