Rajbir Singh v. Haryana Urban Development Authority And ORS

I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH CWP- 9753- 2016 Dat e of deci si on: - 18. 05. 2016 Raj bi r Si ngh . . . Pet i t i oner Ver sus Har yana Ur ban Devel opment Aut hor i t y, Panchkul a and ot her s.

. . . Respondent s CORAM: HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE S. J. VAZI FDAR, ACTI NG CHI EF JUSTI CE HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE ARUN PALLI Pr esent : - Ms. Ani t a Bal yan, Advocat e, f or t he pet i t i oner .

* * * * S. J. VAZI FDAR, A. C. J. ( ORAL) The pet i t i oner i n ef f ect seeks an enf or cement of t he or der of t he l ear ned Si ngl e Judge dat ed

04. 02. 2010 i n CWP- 1902- 2010 f i l ed by hi m.

2.

The pet i t i oner st at es t hat t he r espondent s have not consi der ed hi s r epr esent at i on on t he gr ound t hat anot her case i nvol vi ng a si mi l ar i ssue i s pendi ng. The r espondent s wer e bound t o deci de t he mat t er i n accor dance wi t h l aw i n vi ew of t he or der of t he l ear ned Si ngl e Judge. 3.

The pet i t i oner cl ai ms t o be ent i t l ed t o a pl ot under t he oust ee quot a.

The pet i t i oner i s one of t he co- shar er s. Hi s case i s cover ed by our or der and j udgement dat ed 04. 04. 2016 i n a gr oup of wr i t pet i t i ons t he f i r st of whi ch i s CWP- 6684- 2014 t i t l ed as Sant osh Kumar i Vs St at e of Har yana and ot her s.

4.

Thi s wr i t pet i t i on i s al so di sposed of i n t he same t er ms as CWP- 6684- 2014 and ot her connect ed mat t er s. ( S. J. VAZI FDAR) ACTI NG CHI EF JUSTI CE ( ARUN PALLI ) JUDGE

18. 05. 2016 Amodh AMODH SHARMA 2016.05.19 12:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh