Mohinder Singh Rathee v. Haryana Urban Development Authority And ORS

I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH CWP- 9782- 2016 Dat e of deci si on: - 18. 05. 2016 Mohi nder Si ngh Rat hee . . . Pet i t i oner Ver sus Har yana Ur ban Devel opment Aut hor i t y, Panchkul a and ot her s. . . . Respondent s CORAM: HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE S. J. VAZI FDAR, ACTI NG CHI EF JUSTI CE HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE ARUN PALLI Pr esent : - Ms. Ani t a Bal yan, Advocat e, f or t he pet i t i oner .

* * * * S. J. VAZI FDAR, A. C. J. ( ORAL) The pet i t i oner ' s appl i cat i on f or al l ot ment of a pl ot under t he oust ee quot a was r ej ect ed by t he i mpugned or der dat ed 24. 03. 2015 ( Annexur e P- 3) , i nt er al i a, on t he gr ound t hat t he pet i t i oner was onl y a co- shar er and t hat t he ot her co- shar er s had not i ssued t he NOC. We deci ded a si mi l ar mat t er on 04. 04. 2016 i n a gr oup of wr i t pet i t i ons t he f i r st of whi ch i s CWP- 6684- 2014 t i t l ed as Sant osh Kumar i Vs St at e of Har yana and ot her s. 2.

We do not wi sh t o expr ess any vi ews about t he i mpugned or der at t hi s st age. The or der i s quashed and set asi de onl y f or t he pur pose of di r ect i ng t he r espondent s t o deci de t he pet i t i oner ' s appl i cat i on f or al l ot ment under t he oust ee quot a af r esh i n accor dance wi t h l aw af t er t aki ng i nt o consi der at i on al l t he pr ovi si ons of l aw i ncl udi ng t he sai d or der and j udgement dat ed 04. 04. 2016 i n a gr oup of wr i t pet i t i ons t he f i r st of whi ch i s CWP- 6684- 2014 t i t l ed as Sant osh Kumar i Vs St at e of Har yana and ot her s.

3.

The wr i t pet i t i on i s accor di ngl y di sposed of . ( S. J. VAZI FDAR) ACTI NG CHI EF JUSTI CE ( ARUN PALLI ) JUDGE

18. 05. 2016 Amodh AMODH SHARMA 2016.05.19 12:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh