Ashwani Kumar v. Central Administrative Tribunal Bench Chd & Four & ORS

CWP No. 980 of 2016 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 980 of 2016 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION :- February 24, 2016 Ashwani Kumar

...Petitioner

Versus

Central Administrative Tribunal Bench at Chandigarhand others.

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH Present:- Mr.K.S. Jetley, Advocate for the petitioner. *** 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

Yes/No 2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

Yes/No 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? Yes/No M.JEYAPAUL, J.

C.M. No. 1317 of 2016 The application is allowed as prayed for.

CWP No. 980 of 2016 1.

Learned counsel appearing for the Writ Petitioner submits that the government scheme (Annexure P-10) regarding appointment on compassionate grounds was specifically challenged by the Writ Petitioner before the Tribunal but the same was not discussed by the Tribunal while disposing of the Original Application filed by the Writ Petitioner.

PARVINDER SINGH 2016.02.29 15:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No. 980 of 2016 (O&M) 2.

We suggested to the counsel appearing for the Writ Petitioner that he can very well urge such a point before the Tribunal by filing necessary Review Application. He agrees to such a suggestion emanated from the Court.

3.

In view of the above, the Writ Petition stands disposed of, giving liberty to the Writ Petitioner to file a Review Application before the Tribunal for necessary relief.

(M. JEYAPAUL) JUDGE (RAJ MOHAN SINGH) JUDGE February 24, 2016 p.singh PARVINDER SINGH 2016.02.29 15:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh