Anmol Sharma v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-35227 of 2019 Date of Decision: 06.12.2019 Anmol Sharma

...Petitioner (s)

Versus

State of Punjab & another

...Respondent(s)

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARI PAL VERMA Present:- Mr. Manish Prabhaker, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sukhbeer Singh, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. Rahul Verma, Advocate for respondent no.2-complainant.

***** HARI PAL VERMA, J. (Oral) Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.79 dated 16.07.2019 under Sections 498-A, 406 IPC registered at Police Station Sadar Gurdaspur, District Gurdaspur. Parties are present in person. They have been interacted at sufficient length. The complainant says that she is ready to join the petitioner in a separate house where her mother-in-law is staying. At this stage, counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner, says that the petitioner is staying in a separate house along with his mother and he will welcome the complainant in that house. In fact ASHWANI KUMAR 2019.12.07 11:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Criminal Misc. No. M-35227 of 2019 -2the petitioner has also filed a petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for restitution of his conjugal rights. Since the parties are ad idem to stay together, the complainant is directed to join the petitioner in her matrimonial home where her motherin-law is staying. They are expected to maintain cordial relations. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and the interim order dated 28.08.2019 is made absolute. In case presence of the petitioner is required in the case, a clear 15 days notice be given to him. December 06, 2019 ( HARI PAL VERMA ) AK JUDGE Whether speaking / reasoned?

Yes / No Whether reportable?

Yes / No ASHWANI KUMAR 2019.12.07 11:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document