← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/34994/2025disposed of

Yadwinder Singh And ORS v. State Of Punjab And ORS

2025-08-11Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal2 pages

CRM-M-34994-2025 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-34994-2025 Date of Decision: 11.08.2025 YADWINDER SINGH AND ORS ....Petitioners

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- Mr. Rahul Arora, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Subhash Godara, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. Nitish Garg, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 4. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J (ORAL) 1.

The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short-'BNSS') for quashing of FIR No. 47 dated 25.05.2025, registered under Sections 333/118(1)/115(2)/324(4)/351(2)/191(3)/190 of BNS and Section 25 and 27 of Arms Act registered at Police Station Arif Ke, District Ferozepur (Annexure P-1), and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 12.06.2025 (Annexure P-2). 2.

This Court vide order dated 07.07.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise.

3.

Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the MOHIT 2025.08.18 10:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Ferozepur and got their statements

CRM-M-34994-2025 -2recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has submitted report dated 28.07.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence.

4.

Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 4 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5.

In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6.

Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No. 47 dated 25.05.2025, registered under Sections 333/118(1)/115(2)/324(4)/351(2)/191(3)/190 of BNS and Section 25 and 27 of Arms Act registered at Police Station Arif Ke, District Ferozepur (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 26.06.2025 (Annexure P-2) are quashed qua the petitioners.

(RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 11.08.2025 JUDGE Mohit Bishnoi Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No MOHIT 2025.08.18 10:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document