High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/9936/2016disposed of

Om Parkash v. Municipal Corporation Gurgaon Etc

2016-05-19Mr. Justice S.C. Datta2 pages

-1CWP No.9936 of 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.9936 of 2016 Date of decision: 19.05.2016 Om Parkash ....Petitioner

Versus

Municipal Corporation, Gurgaon and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH DHALIWAL 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2) To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: - Mr. R.S. Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner. PARAMJEET SINGH DHALIWAL, J. (ORAL) Instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No.1 to initiate proceedings against respondents No.2 to 9 for illegal encroachment on the public land. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that earlier notices dated 18.09.2015 were given to the private respondents for removal of unauthorised construction raised by them in contravention of Section 250 of the Haryana Municipal Corporation Act, 1994. Thereafter, order dated 29.09.2015 (Annexure P-4) was passed. Another order dated 14.12.2015 (Annexure P-5) was issued but no action has been taken.

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that he has already moved representation dated 22.01.2016 (Annexure P-6) before the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Gurgaon to proceed in accordance with law but RAVINDER SINGH 2016.05.

-2CWP No.9936 of 2016 nothing is being done.

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and after perusing the paper-book, however, without commenting on merits of the case, instant petition is disposed of, without issuing notice to the respondents, with a direction to respondent No.1 - Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Gurgaon, to look into the grievance of the petitioner specifically made in representation dated 22.01.2016 (Annexure P-6) and take appropriate action in accordance with law preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioner.

(Paramjeet Singh Dhaliwal) Judge May 19, 2016 R.S.

RAVINDER SINGH 2016.05.23 15:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document