Divya And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-7093-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.06.2026 Divya and another

...Petitioners

VERSUS

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Karan Singh, Advocate for Mr. Devender Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner(s). ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The petitioners namely Divya and Ajit have approached this Court under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India for seeking protection of their life and personal liberty from the private respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that the petitioners are major and are staying together in live-in relationship, however, petitioner No.2 is not of marriageable age. However, their relationship is not acceptable to the private respondents and as a result thereof, the private respondents are threatening the petitioners. Separate representations dated 08.06.2026 (Annexure P-4 and P-3) against the threat extended at the hands of the private respondents already stands submitted by the petitioners to the respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, District Rohtak as well as respondent No.3-Station House Officer, Police Station Kalanaur, District Rohtak.

MANGAL SINGH 2026.06.16 15:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRWP-7093-2026 (O&M) The petitioners apprehend threat to their lives and claim that there is a constant danger of them being implicated in a false case. Notice of motion restricted to respondents No.1 to 3 only. Pursuant to supply of advance copy, Mr. Paras Talwar, Sr. DAG Haryana, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. He submits that he has no objection if appropriate direction for providing requisite protection to the petitioners is given. As such, the petition is disposed of with the directions to respondent No.3-Station House Officer, Police Station Kalanaur, District Rohtak to look into the grievances of the petitioners as set out in the petition and also expressed in the representation dated 08.06.2026 (Annexure P-3) and take appropriate action for protection of their lives and liberty as may be warranted by the circumstances.

However, it is clarified that in case any criminal case has been/is registered against the petitioners nothing in this order shall be construed as a bar for taking appropriate action by the police authorities in respect thereof in accordance with law.

The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order along with copy of the petition and above-said representation to respondent No.3Station House Officer, Police Station Kalanaur, District Rohtak for requisite compliance.

The petition is disposed of.

(VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 16.06.2026 JUDGE Mangal Singh Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No MANGAL SINGH 2026.06.16 15:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document