Manoj Kumar v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.23459 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision.30.08.2019 Manoj Kumar

...Petitioner

Vs State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

Present:

Mr. Sunil K. Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL -.- AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 22.04.2019 (Annexure P-9) within a stipulated period. Without going into the merits and demerits of the claim of the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 22.04.2019 (Annexure P-9) within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and respondent No.2 shall pass a speaking order thereon, failing which respondent No.2 shall be liable to pay costs of `25,000/- to the petitioner. This condition of imposing costs is only to prevent petitioner from running pillar to post and avail remedy of contempt in case of non-compliance of directions issued by this Court.

The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE August 30, 2019 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned No Whether reportable No PANKAJ KUMAR 2019.09.02 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document