Ramdev v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-35228-2025 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-35228-2025 Date of Decision: 11.07.2025 RAMDEV ... PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA ... RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- Mr. Vipin Pal Yadav, Advocate for Mr. J.S.Sohal, Advocate for the petitioner.

H.S. Grewal, J.(Oral) 1.

This petition has been filed for grant of regular bail under Section 483 of BNSS in case FIR No. 02 dated 01.02.2025 under Sections 238, 318(4) and 61-B of BNS, 2023 registered at Police Station Cyber Crime Narnaul, District Mahendergarh.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with co-accused indulged in cyber crime and duped large amounts of money from various people. Subsequently, certain amounts have been recovered from the co-accused. He further submits that no amount of money is stated to have been recovered from the present petitioner and only a single mobile phone was recovered from him. The petitioner is in custody since 17.02.2025.

3.

Notice of motion.

4.

Mr. Parveen Kumar Aggarwal, Addl.AG., Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. Learned State counsel has filed the custody Renu Rawat 2025.07.12 15:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-35228-2025 -2certificate in the Court today, which is taken on record. As per custody certificate, the petitioner is in custody for the last 04 months and 22 days and is not involved in any other case. He vehemently opposes the prayer for grant of regular bail to the petitioner. He further submits that the charges have been framed against the petitioner and trial is yet to commence. 5.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

6.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case and the fact that the petitioner is in custody for 04 months and 22 days, the continuous detention of the petitioner would not serve the ends of justice, this Court deems it a fit case to grant the concession of regular bail to the petitioner during the pendency of the trial.

7.

Therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing requisite bail bonds, surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate/Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned.

8.

It is clarified that if on bail so granted through the instant order, the petitioner is found indulging in any other criminal case it shall be open to the State to seek cancellation of his bail.

(H.S.GREWAL) 11.07.2025 JUDGE renu Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No Renu Rawat 2025.07.12 15:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document