Anil Kumar v. State Of U. T. Chandigarh

-1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:17.12.2021 Anil Kumar ...... Petitioner

Versus

State of U.T. Chandigarh ......... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH

Present:

Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

  

    ***** AMOL RATTAN SINGH, J. (ORAL) ase heard via    

  

 !  "# $$"$ %& '($# # $)$ $$ 

*#&

$"

* # +,-.

/ "$  0   $  0   2        3 4

        $$ 



$# $ " # $ $

0 $ 56475/273

,8!0 564&

, "

 9 :  $

# $ "$  # +,-   "$  $$ 

$# $ " # $ $

0 $56475/273

,# !

$  "

 # $ $

0 354

"   0$$ $;

    $#   / 8 #< & 9 

 # 0 564&

, " 

 #  # $ $

0 658 9

-2- !

$ !

"  $    $$ 

 #  "

   <

 

 " $"   "     $$  .



  

 $)

 
  

     ## $  #$  "  

$# & 0   #

# "    $

   " $

#   $  =$ "$  $#$$  $# $* $       $$ $ >   "$  # # $ "

   ! !)    !

"   "

  #   $ 

$  >

  "

    $   "

$     $ $

 

  < 

 "

$  ?

 6   , !  @

$   # # $  $ ! $     

# $>   A    

  /  < "B0    $" !$  " )   $#$ 

 #  "  "

 " 0$$ $;

   $ $

 # $ " 0 564&

, ?

$  $  $     $ > #$  "$ !  )    

$

  $, the petition is allowed, with the order dated 01.11.2021 made absolute, on the

-3same terms and conditions December 17, 2021 (AMOL RATTAN SINGH) dinesh JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No