Arun v. State Of Haryana And ORS
YOGESH SHARMA 2019.10.24 18:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-29681-2018 (O&M) 233-4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CWP-29681-2018 (O&M) Date of decision : 22.10.2019 Arun ... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others ... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:
Mr. Krishan Kumar Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Kiran Pal Singh, AAG, Haryana.
**** AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the State has produced detailed Marks obtained by the petitioner, in a sealed cover. The same has been opened, perused and on comparison with cut off 128 for the post of Heavy Vehicle Driver under Economically Backward Persons in General Category, the petitioner has obtained 119 marks, therefore, has not been able to come within the zone of consideration.
In such circumstances, no cause of action survives in the present writ petition and accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed. ( AMIT RAWAL ) JUDGE 22.10.2019 Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No