Rasoi Canten And Caterers v. National Institute Of Technology

CWP-18666 of 2025 (O&M) 5.

Communication issued by petitioner to the respondent, attached as Annexures (P-4 & P-5) respectively dated 26.03.2025 and 26.04.2025 indicate that some complaints may have been filed against the petitioner.

6.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that copies of such complaints have not been supplied to the petitioner despite specific requests made by him.

7.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we do not find any ground to interfere in the matter at this stage as the dispute is purely of contractual nature. Learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to point out any ground whatsoever which call for interference in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. At this stage learned counsel for petitioner submits that respondents be directed to decide representations dated 26.03.2025 and 26.04.2025 submitted by it in a time bound manner by passing a speaking order.

8.

At this stage we do not find any justification for issuance of such a direction. Petitioner is at liberty to pursue the matter with respondents in accordance with law and/or avail remedy (ies) as may be available to it in accordance with law.

CWP-18666 of 2025 (O&M) 9.

Writ petition is accordingly dismissed with liberty as aforesaid.

( LISA GILL) JUDGE (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE July 09, 2025 archana Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No